Bradley vs Campbell = Controversy

First off let me say congratulations to Devon Alexander the Great in a good showing against Junior Witter. The main event Campbell vs Bradley had an ending full of controversy. I will say I had the matchup 3-0 for Timothy Bradley. In the 3rd round it was an obvious headbutt that caused the cut over Campbell's eye. I understand what was going on from the refs side of things there were a few clash of heads in the matchup from the opening bell. This specific headbutt caused a cut and should have been ruled a no contest from a clash of heads. The ruling by the referee was wrong but you have to respect it just because hes the man in control of how the fighters fight and he determines whats right and wrong in the ring. How the fight was going I couldnt see Nate Campbell winning it Timothy Bradley wasnt going to shut him out but the elusiveness and movement was bothering Campbell. Nate was winning maybe the first minute of every round only to get it taken away from him in the last two minutes. Bradley was just going to steal rounds that way. I predicted Nate to win the fight but hey Bert Sugar is wrong at times as well. Should there be a rematch? Yes only to be fair because it was a clash of heads, and should have been a no contest. I personally didnt like Bradley's trash talking after the match and Nate did have a justifiable reaction. So lets see what the WBO decides to do because it was an obvious clash of heads if theres blood behind Nate's left eye and Bradley doesnt have the punching power to do that so lets hope he WBO is fair and I'll talk about it. Congrats to Devon Alexander and Timothy Bradley

30-27 Bradley

thanks for reading